Also consistent with the philosophy of non-governmental interference, doing with one’s body what one desires is desired. As such, engaging in compensated sex with a consensual partner is deemed to be nobody’s business except the participants to such endeavor. Indeed, moralizing the economics of relationships is a slippery slope. Does a man or woman who dates because of an attraction to the other party based upon the other party’s financial assets mean that the government should come in and prevent such a pairing?
Once again, if the sex is provided by one party for a fee, then it could be taxed as a business. These tax revenues could then be used for prostitute health maintenance assistance, educational endeavors and other useful social purposes.
Also once again, removing the criminal element from the equation will reduce court clog, enhance law enforcement focus on important crimes and reduce revenue streams to criminal elements.